A dedicated team of Gibson Dunn attorneys collaborated with Sanctuary for Families to obtain a final order of protection for “Claire” against her abusive ex-partner in a case involving tech-facilitated abuse, a form of abuse that is becoming increasingly ubiquitous.
Sanctuary for Families’ Pro Bono Project has the honor of working annually with hundreds of extremely dedicated and expert pro bono attorneys. As part of our Pro Bono Spotlight, we highlight some of the great work done by Sanctuary pro bono attorneys!
*Please note that this blog contains descriptions of abuse that could be triggering*
A dedicated team of Gibson Dunn attorneys collaborated with Sanctuary for Families to obtain a final order of protection for “Claire” against her abusive ex-partner in a case involving tech-facilitated abuse, a form of abuse that is becoming increasingly ubiquitous. Tech-facilitated abuse, also called cyber abuse, includes an array of harassment tactics such as hacking, installation of spyware, stalking, spoofing, identity theft, impersonation, sexual extortion (colloquially known as “sextortion”), and the nonconsensual distribution or threat of distribution of intimate images and videos.
“We are so grateful to Gibson Dunn for their incredible advocacy on behalf of a client who experienced threats of image-based abuse and other forms of technology-facilitated abuse, including threats and repeated harassment. Online abuse is too often dismissed and belittled, even though the damage is overwhelming and even life-ruining for survivors. Gibson Dunn’s advocacy in this case resulted in an extremely positive outcome for the client and led to her feeling supported and validated in what she had experienced. Congratulations to the whole team!”
– Lindsey Song, Associate Program Director, Family Law Project at Sanctuary for Families and Co-Chair, New York Cyber Abuse Task Force
After Claire ended her relationship, her ex-partner continued to threaten and harass her and her mother by making threats to circulate intimate images of Claire in an attempt to control her actions. While Claire had obtained a temporary order of protection in Family Court, she needed support in securing a permanent order of protection to truly be able to move on from this abusive relationship.
Gibson Dunn readily took on the challenge to support Sanctuary in representing Claire in a critical fact-finding hearing. As a result of Sanctuary and Gibson Dunn’s tireless efforts in crafting compelling arguments and thoroughly preparing Claire for her testimony and cross-examination, the Court ruled that Claire’s abuser had committed a family offense, thereby granting her a final order of protection.
This remarkable victory has allowed Claire the space to heal and move forward with her life without fear. Here, the Gibson Dunn team comprised of Jacqueline E. Malzone, Associate Attorney; Carolyn Ye, Associate Attorney; and Christina Andersen, Of Counsel, explores the professional development afforded by this opportunity and how it shaped their perception and approach towards trauma-informed lawyering and tackling cyber abuse cases.
Tell me about the case. What went into preparations?
A lot of preparation went into this case. First and foremost, we spent significant time with our client understanding her story, nailing down the details and the timelines, gathering evidence – such as screenshots, text message chains, and call logs. We ultimately utilized firm resources to obtain a forensic screen of her phone in order to best preserve her text and phone records. We also utilized third-party translators to obtain certified translations of non-English messages that were helpful to our case. We then spent many hours with our client preparing her for direct examination – making sure she was comfortable enough telling her story in a clear and compelling manner, but also making sure we as her attorneys were comfortable guiding her through examination. This part of the process really built our strong relationship with our client. And of course, we had to prepare our client to be questioned by her abuser, who was representing himself pro se. This was one of the most difficult parts of our preparation, as this can reopen traumatic wounds, and our goal in this process above all is to protect our client. On our own, we spent significant time reviewing and organizing evidence and preparing legal arguments to convince the court of our argument and ways to prevent the court from accepting the abuser’s irrelevant evidence. Lindsey Song from Sanctuary for Families was also an incredible resource and guide during Claire’s entire case and was there with us every step of the way.
What interested you in working on this case pro bono?
A desire to use our legal training and skills to help our client advocate for herself and pursue the protection from abusive and coercive conduct provided by the law.
How did working on this case shape your understanding of trauma-informed lawyering?
Trauma-informed lawyering requires tiptoeing a very delicate line between needing to share all the unpleasant details with the court while minding your client’s mental health and wellbeing. Working on this case was an exercising of learning where that line is and how to avoid crossing it. Sanctuary for Families was an incredible resource, particularly in guiding our initial conversations with our client to ensure that even as we were new to the process, we did not endanger our client’s wellbeing.
What are some approaches you will adopt in future cyber abuse cases based on this experience?
We will focus immediately on comprehensive discovery of social media messages and a variety of chat and instant message platforms using all the digital forensic tools available.
What are some lasting impacts from the case?
A desire to work on more cases! It was also so incredibly rewarding to see just the depth of relief that Claire had after the judge awarded her a final order of protection. She had been so strong and brave throughout the whole process, and seeing her finally feel safe is something we’ll never forget.
We are extremely grateful to Jacqueline, Carolyn, and Christina for their outstanding advocacy and commitment to serving survivors.